Assignment 5a – Research Proposal - Corrie Mahon
I would like to research into image manipulation in portraiture and ask if this acceptable to the majority of people. This is a ‘hunch’ as I feel that the majority will say that it is unacceptable to manipulate to the extent that a portrait is untruthful but controversially I think that most people would rather see themselves altered. Perhaps an alter ego is preferred in reality. Alter ego – “a perfect substitute” (dictionary.com, 2011)
One person in particular that stands out as experimental in alter egos or stereotypes is Cindy Sherman. She used “photography to explore the meaning of identity”. (Newton and Rolph, 2003, p.64)
Images have been manipulated in photography and art for many years, initially seen in classical artworks, but more intensely in recent years. Garcia has also noted this when she said, “Photography is commonly associated with fact, yet it has been a medium for fiction from the very beginning. Since it’s inception in 1839, artists have explored photography’s vast creative potential, which included the capacity to convey deliberately crafted “untruths.”” (Garcia, 2010, p.6)
I feel that this investigation is needed to enable people to be more accepting and positive about image manipulation in portraiture and to diminish conflict in it’s use. Image manipulation is prolific in glossy fashion magazine covers (Vogue, etc) right the way through to contemporary family portraiture now commercially used. My practice as a portrait photographer in a commercial setting has caused me to question my use of image manipulation and contextually it’s wider use in public media. How much is too much? How much is acceptable? And why is its use frowned upon? Can this be damaging to certain social groups or can its use be for a positive therapeutic outcome?
In a Socio-economic context such glamorous portrayal of people attracts the majority. Many people buy into an idealised notion. This is emphasised by David Bate whilst discussing Victorian Portraiture when he wrote “To be pictured holding a learned book, or photographed in front of the backdrop of a stately home, revealed the aspirations of the sitter more than their own actual status. Carte-de-visite photographs typically emphasized these social aspirations of the sitter, while more ‘up-market’ social portraits emphasized that sitter’s particular ‘personality’” (Bate, 2009, p.70) But from a Critical-philosophical view is it acceptable to be shown or seen in a way that is not truthful.
In order to answer this I will research critical sources along with the context in which I work and the wider context of imagery used in media. I feel that it will be valuable to carry out a public survey according to gender, age and social background in the form of questionnaires. This research will also have validity in my commercial portraiture work as the area of ‘alter ego’ portraiture is of great interest to me.
References
Bate, D., 2009. Photography the Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.
Garcia, E. C., 2010. Photography as Fiction. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum.
Newton, K. and Rolph, C. 2003. Masquerade: Women’s Contemporary Portrait Photography. Cardiff: Ffotogallery.
Bibliography
Bate, D., 2009. Photography the Key Concepts. Oxford: Berg.
Garcia, E C., 2010. Photography as Fiction. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum.
Newton, K. and Rolph, C., 2003. Masquerade: Women’s Contemporary Portrait Photography. Cardiff: Ffotogallery.
Doy, G., 2007. Claude Cahun - A Sensual Politics of Photography. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Angier, R., 2007. Train Your Gaze – A Practical and Theoretical Introduction to Portrait Photography. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.
Adams, R., 1996. Beauty in Photography. New York: Aperture.
Ewing, W A., 2006. Face – The New Photographic Portrait. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Ewing, W A., 2000. The Century of the Body. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Cotton, C., 2000. Imperfect Beauty – The Making of Contemporary Fashion Photographs. London: V&A Publications.
Wells, L., 2003. The Photography Reader. Oxon: Routledge.